The Online Resume System is Broken—Customer-Centric Marketing is the Answer
For decades, job seekers have been trapped in an impersonal, frustrating cycle of applying to jobs online, only to feel like their resumes disappear into the void. Meanwhile, businesses struggle to find the right candidates despite an overwhelming flood of applications.
So, how did we get here? And more importantly, what’s the solution? The answer isn't more algorithms—it’s a customer-centric marketing approach that prioritizes human connection over keyword-matching systems.
A Brief History of Online Resume Platforms
Before the internet, job seekers printed out their resumes, walked into businesses, asked for the manager, and handed over their credentials in person. There was eye contact, a handshake, and an immediate first impression.
Then, in the 1990s and early 2000s, platforms like Monster.com, Indeed, and LinkedIn changed the job market forever. Suddenly, resumes became digital. At first, this seemed like an incredible advancement—companies could receive applications at scale, and job seekers could apply to multiple positions with the click of a button.
But soon, human resources teams realized they didn’t need to take job postings down once a position was filled. Instead, they could leave them up indefinitely, collecting a steady stream of candidates to keep on file.
Job seekers, realizing their resumes were being ignored, began applying en masse—sending out hundreds, even thousands, of applications in hopes of getting noticed.
The result? An overwhelming flood of generic resumes.
How Technology Turned Resumes Into an SEO Game
With HR departments drowning in applications, tech companies introduced resume-scanning algorithms to pre-filter candidates using keywords. On paper, this seemed like a smart solution: if a job listing required "project management experience," only resumes containing that phrase would get through.
But what happened next?
Job seekers, catching on to the system, began stuffing their resumes with keywords—often copying entire job descriptions just to make it past the filters. Suddenly, resumes weren’t about showcasing actual skills and experience—they were about gaming an algorithm.
The result? Employers still weren’t getting quality candidates, and job seekers felt more disconnected than ever.
So what did companies do next? They doubled down on barriers.
The Rise of Ridiculous Hiring Tests
Businesses, convinced that job seekers weren’t truly interested in their openings, added more hoops to jump through:
Requiring applicants to submit videos explaining why they were a good fit
Hiding "easter eggs" in job descriptions to test if candidates were paying attention
Mandating unpaid assignments to "prove" their abilities
Asking for years of experience for entry-level roles
Rather than fixing the problem, these extra steps only discouraged qualified candidates while still failing to produce better hires.
The truth is, the system is broken.
The Best Hiring Method Has Always Been Human Referrals
Despite all the technology, hiring managers still find their best candidates the old-fashioned way—through referrals.
Think about it:
A boss tells their team,
"Hey, if you know someone good for this role, let me know."
An employee responds,
"I have a friend who does that! I'll connect them."
No keyword stuffing. No AI filters. No impersonal application portals. Just a human recommending another human.
Why does this work so well? Because humans trust humans.
When a friend refers a friend, there's an implicit level of accountability. Plus, while companies screen applicants based on education and job history, they hire based on culture fit—something no resume can capture.
The Solution: Customer-Centric Marketing in Hiring
Instead of trying to "fix" resumes with better algorithms, companies need to rethink hiring through a customer-centric marketing lens.
What if businesses marketed their open roles the way they market their products?
Define the ideal candidate experience—not just the job requirements
Engage employees as brand ambassadors to refer great candidates
Use AI to enhance, not replace, human connections
AI shouldn’t be used to block candidates—it should empower employees to better understand the type of person their company needs.
Instead of automating rejection, AI can facilitate introductions.
Imagine an AI tool that:
Helps employees identify who in their network fits a role
Suggests the best ways to introduce a candidate to a hiring manager
Tracks which referrals lead to successful hires
Rather than building more walls between employers and job seekers, we need tools that strengthen human relationships.
The Future of Hiring Starts with Connection
The online resume system isn’t working. Businesses are drowning in bad applications. Job seekers feel invisible. Algorithms are making things worse.
It’s time for a new approach—one that prioritizes relationships over automation and trust over keyword-matching.
The companies that understand this won’t just fill roles faster—they’ll attract and retain the best talent.
What do you think? Have you had success (or frustration) with online job applications? Share your experiences below! 💬👇
Comments